Reader’s Dilemma #1, of course, is “Many Books, Little Time” – which, inevitably – at least for many of us booklovers – leads to a semi-reluctant reliance on book reviews as a device for discerning what we shall risk reading, of all the possible things out there vying for our bookish attention.
In a brilliant explanation of how exasperating it can be to be overly-dependent on book critics, the editors of n+1 recently pointed out why we readers are so often disappointed with so many book reviews – and how book blurbs (often cropped from reviews) are more often misleading than helpful.
The problem, it seems, has a lot to do with how book reviews (and book blurbs) are usually written and the conditions under which people often write them.
The article is long, but certainly summarizes Reader’s Dilemma #34.
Found via an alert at Arts & Letters Daily