Whether printed books are superior to, or merely precursors to, screen-transmitted words continues to be controversial.
A subset of that wide-ranging debate is the argument about the physiological differences (?) in the brain when a reader uses a book vs. when a reader uses a screen. This was touched on recently in the form of a survey of some recent books on this (and related) subjects; the survey was written by Thomas Larson and posted at The Rumpus.
Read Larson’s article (and the interesting readers’ comments).
Posted by Cal
If the pleasures of reading books depended on how much we readers are able to remember what we’ve read…well, there’d probably be a lot less reading going on.
Read the blurbs for – and a chapter from – this March 2009 book that examines the pleasures and advantages of “slow reading” 